|
|
|
|
|
|
by mih
704 days ago
|
|
|
Another user of pdm here for professional projects. It sure is more standards compliant than poetry. Support for in-project venvs and integration of configs for packages such as pytest is quite useful. When evaluating package managers, poetry for sure was a contender. However listening to others experiences regarding poetry developers introducing breaking changes that could potentially cause the CI pipeline made it a no go [1]. uv seems to be coming along rather nicely, but wasn't anywhere near the level of stability compared to pdm during the evaluation phase. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr9o8MW_pb0 |
|
|
https://python-poetry.org/docs/configuration/#virtualenvsin-...