|
|
|
|
|
by llamaimperative
715 days ago
|
|
Yeah this comment also points to William James and the rest of the Pragmatists. Something is true if and only if it is useful. Our good scientific theories are good specifically and solely because they're useful to us -- their actual underlying truth is not only indiscernible outside of the context of validating useful claims, but any such concept of "underlying truth" (below/separately from what's useful) doesn't even have meaning. |
|
Watch out for how you're calculating utility though (or, if you are not actually calculating it and this fact isn't even on your radar).
> but any such concept of "underlying truth" (below/separately from what's useful) doesn't even have meaning
Watch out for this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_and_indirect_realism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_(psychology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind