[masklinn]

Rust does not have constructors at all[0], it uses factory functions (conventionally named `new_somethignsomething`) but those are not special to the language.

[0] except in the more generalised haskell-ish sense that structs or enum variants can be constructed and some forms (“tuple structs” and “tuple variants”) will expose an actual function

[collinvandyck76]

I've often longed for first class constructors in Go and Rust. It was more of a problem for me with Go because you can omit a struct field when building a value, something you can't do in Rust unless it has an explicit Default impl and even then you have to explicitly add ..Default::defualt() when you're building the value.

I never thought that constructors were that burdensome and therefore do not understand the omission in other languages like Go and Rust that followed. Quite the opposite really -- knowing that a type always went through a predefined init was comforting to me when writing Java.

[gavindean90]

I think people don’t like constructors because of the potential side effects of something happening in constructors, especially if the constructor is big or doesn’t finish properly.