|
|
|
|
|
by WithinReason
712 days ago
|
|
I think you're right. I used to be an fps purist like everyone in this thread, but now I have a much more unpopular opinion. I think that frame rate enhancing features of TVs are a good thing. Hear me out. The only reason 24 fps is popular is because that's what people got used to in the early days of cinema. Objectively speaking, 24 fps is a horrible choice of frame rate for movies. It's terrible at conveying fast motion properly. We no longer have technological barriers that limit us to 24 fps any more. The main reason we're sticking with it is because old people associate 30 fps and higher frame rates with soap operas that were shot in 30 fps. Young people don't really have this association and don't mind high frame rates, they are used to 60 fps video shot by phones. So I think if we could just all agree to bite the bullet and get used to high frame rates we could finally move forward to proper high fps cinema, and we can do that by enabling frame rate conversion features that TVs have. So please, just turn it on and get used to how it looks. It's for the betterment of mankind. |
|
The gist is that, for animation, frame interpolation messes with intended timing and can produce incoherent images on interpolated frames and odd frame rate issues for certain kinds of animations. Interpolation can thus cause animations to lose their punch and feel wrong.
While interpolation may be nice for live action films, it should still be an option to turn off.