|
|
|
|
|
by Tainnor
714 days ago
|
|
> No, you don't just "say" that. You prove it. Big difference. Whether a^b=exp(b*log(a)) is a definition or a proof really depends on how exactly you define certain terms (e.g. exp). What's certainly a theorem that requires a proof is that the definition of a^b (for irrational b) via limits of rational exponents and the one via exp are equivalent. |
|