|
|
|
|
|
by Delphiza
712 days ago
|
|
Leetcode is significantly overrepresented on HN. Leetcode is barely a thing across most of the world. Mid-career dev jobs in non-FAANG (and their orbiting startups) organisations don't expect people to spend their time studying for leetcode interviews. Leet is definitely not a thing in other industries - you don't interview for, say, a logistics co-ordinator, by making them study and regurgitate logistics theory. The short answer to your question, and to try and not start up another HN thread on how good or bad differing interviewing techniques are, is that we did things similar to how most recruiters and hiring managers are still doing it across the world. I think the big difference is more around getting to the first interview. Technology means that there are more applicants, automation of filtering (bad), and remote interviews than there used to be in the past. The funnels to get candidates may have changed, but in my experience, once in the final stretch things are pretty much the same as they have always been. |
|