|
|
|
|
|
by uoaei
715 days ago
|
|
Without delving too far into the philosophy of math as concerns existence vs convention... e pops up quite often when taking limits on a surprising number of varied phenomena. It is much more than a mere convention, unless you subscribe to the nihilistic, anti-epistemological notion that all of mathematics is merely convention. It seems to be the center of the conceptual space particularly around questions of relative and absolute scale. It's true you can use any base for computing things but some are more natural than others in that specific parametrizations have natural interpretations especially when it comes to physics (timescales, information-theoretic optimality, etc.). |
|