|
|
|
|
|
|
by slidehero
714 days ago
|
|
|
>I've been bullish[1] on this as a major aspect of generative AI for a while now, so it's great to see this paper published. Me too. My first thought when seeing 2D AI generated images was that 3D would be a logical next step. Compared to pixels, there's so much additional data to work with when training these models I just assumed that 3D would be an easier problem to solve than 2D image generation. You have 3D point data, edges, edge loops, bone systems etc and a lot of the existing data is pretty well labeled too. |
|
|