Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tempodox 721 days ago
Highly interesting, I'm looking forward to this.

But the `member_number` functions in § 3.2 look disturbing to me. It's not discernible how invalid arguments are handled. Normally I'd look at generated assembly to answer a question like that, but this probably doesn't make sense with compile-time-fu (`constexpr`)…