Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by redserk 716 days ago
Define “the people”. For works of it’s time, it is broadly used to mean both individuals and an elected government.

You’re utilizing one definition of a term that never had concrete meaning, so your reasoning is both imprecise and potentially erroneous.

1 comments

I think it is pretty clear.

It is hard to see why a state would feel the need to include the government's ability to own weapons at all, let alone in a document listing rights and protections for individual citizens. Furthermore, the statements already draw a distinction between the people and an army controlled by the government.

The document wasn’t for individuals. That’s quite the misunderstanding of basic history here.