[contingencies]

It is pompous to suggest that only 'academics' and 'professionals' have insight.

One does not "discuss about", one "discusses".

Those periods of ancient Chinese history most celebrated for their cultural and technical achievements are generally agreed upon by scholars, I simply provided the most referenced subset. By your logic, anything pre-modern is horrific. I would tend to side more with the inverse perspective.

As an actual foreign investor in China, I did not and do not care about listing rules, because they're irrelevant to most businesses in most situations.

[naravara]

They don’t have a monopoly on insight but they do have one on career prospects in the field unfortunately.

(You can always cheat your way in if you have fuck-you money though, so hedge fund managers always get a say too.)