|
|
|
|
|
by tcmart14
717 days ago
|
|
The problem isn't them. We just not too long ago have a court case that questioned whether the President is considered an "officer of the United States." The unfortunate part of law is, half of law is arguing about what 'is' is. So its not necessarily that words don't have meaning. Its more of, the words can change meaning. |
|
The Roberts court is just arbitrarily choosing whatever justification they happen to like for any given case to push an extremist agenda.