|
|
|
|
|
|
by tines
725 days ago
|
|
|
> why would they need legal immunity? Because there's a gap between here and there, and we don't want to make that gap narrower than it already is. The president can now do a whole lot of illegal shit that falls short of "assassinating anyone at any time," and face no consequences. By allowing one we inch closer to the other. |
|
|