[alberth]

> Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!

As someone who doesn't know this kind of stuff well, will this cause OpenBSD to have to update the statement above?

https://www.openbsd.org

EDIT:

TFA says:

> OpenBSD is not vulnerable.

[rany_]

OpenBSD isn't vulnerable, from https://www.qualys.com/2024/07/01/cve-2024-6387/regresshion....:

> We have not investigated any other libc or operating system; but OpenBSD is notably not vulnerable, because its SIGALRM handler calls syslog_r(), an async-signal-safer version of syslog() that was invented by OpenBSD in 2001.