|
|
|
|
|
by cornholio
717 days ago
|
|
It's surprising people still consider large scale language models as a key solution to the problem of AGI, when it has become quite clear they will hit all practical scaling limits without surpassing the "well informed imbecile" intelligence threshold. All evidence points towards human reason as a fundamentally different approach, orders of magnitude more efficient at integrating and making sense of ridiculously smaller amounts of training data. |
|
And all evidence actually points toward human reason as an incredibly inefficient and horrifyingly error-prone approach, that only got as far as it did because we're running 8.1 billion human minds in parallel.
While evidence suggests that human reasoning uses a fundamentally different approach, it remains to be seen whether human reasoning uses a fundamentally superior approach.