[ceejayoz]

> Which part do you find ‘not reputable’ source of facts?

The complete lack of any supporting links, and the general vagueness of the claims; "potential misuse", "potential mismanagement", "sparked a debate" are not particularly strong claims.

Where's the reputable source for "infiltrated by anti Hindu interests" or "drilling and building within temple stone walls that are hundreds of years old and installing ceilings fans and lights"? Why is Modi's Hindu nationalist BJP permitting such a thing?

[jelliclesfarm]

These are legal cases and writs filed in courts.

https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=hr%20and%20ce+doc...

Or

https://hindupost.in/dharma-religion/tn-heritage-destroyed-g...

Or

https://swarajyamag.com/amp/story/news-brief/misuse-of-templ...

Or

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD1nfo-60R_Kn2R58RLIaNB...

What would satisfy you as a ‘reputable source’. I will try and find it for you. Obviously this is very important for you.

Modi’s BJP govt is central govt. This is happening in Tamil Nadu.

[ceejayoz]

> What would satisfy you as a ‘reputable source’.

A major, well-respected news source supporting your very specific claims.

Not YouTube, not a right-wing mouthpiece (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swarajya_(magazine)) alleging what sounds like pretty run-of-the-mill corruption, not a website with a Gmail account (https://hindupost.in/about-us/) (which I'd note is complaining about a single security camera being added at a temple... maybe to address the thefts you decry), and not a search engine result for `hr and ce doctypes: judgments` that could literally contain anything.