[chipdart]

> Because they are.

I don't think so. Feel free to try to explain in your own words why you feel an ad-hominem is relevant.

> You speak as though you are the OP (...)

I speak up when I see attempts to derrail an interesting discussion by conspiracy-oriented ad-hominem attacks.

Again, why do you think your complains are relevant to the fact that this post is being flagged?

[57FkMytWjyFu]

You seem to think I want to gallop around with you. I'm not accountable to you. I love to derail spammy garbage though.

[chipdart]

> You seem to think I want to gallop around with you. I'm not accountable to you. I love to derail spammy garbage though.

I'm asking (for the third time, mind you) why do you think your complains are relevant to the fact that this post is being flagged.

You're repeatedly trying to dodge the question.

Can't you even explain your own train of thought? What does this say about it?