[Pi9h]

I should have been more explicit.

I do not intend to change the Postgres database or introduce a new one. I’m sure this won’t be an issue for the majority use-case.

However, I am open to learning more about alternate ways to efficiently handle Yjs state updates, which may be useful for a cloud version that would run at scale. If I were to go that way, it would not affect self-hosted users and would probably be via a reference pointer and not a database switch.

This is absolutely not an issue at the moment. Nothing to worry about.