|
|
|
|
|
by bedatadriven
721 days ago
|
|
I'd encourage you to take another look at the article because I don't think your criticisms are well founded. The javascript version does exist! The fact that it's produced by a compiler doesn't undermine it's existence. What's interesting here is not that it's slower than the equivalent running on the JVM but that it was _faster_ than a version compiled to wasm. Well written and useful article if you would like to learn about what type of optimizations are effective in targeting the wasmgc runtime. |
|