|
|
|
|
|
|
by threwawasy1228
716 days ago
|
|
|
I don't need to see the link, I am aware of what your stance roughly is. I'm saying: Why are you so intolerant of the freedoms of other people to make their own choices about what license structures are best for them and their needs? Developers should have the freedom to choose whatever license they please. Just because you have a pet category of license structure that you think everyone should use, why can't you be respectful of those who choose other options? It is essentially you forcing your narrow definition of what you think licenses are and how they should be structured onto everyone else? Why can't people simply say they understand the various licensing options but they choose one that isn't the one you like after a careful consideration? Are they simply not allowed to have a diffferent opinion than you? If you make your argument and the maintainer still chooses another license, that is a failure on the part of the FSF to properly sell their mission or elaborate their arguments. Does the fact that someone chose something other than what you prefer mean that you now need to go around evangelizing every time that any non-FOSS license is used? |
|
|