|
|
|
|
|
by doctorpangloss
727 days ago
|
|
Do you find it frustrating that what people basically want is: (1) you, for free (2) develop all the functionality of RabbitMQ as a Postgres extension with the most permissive license (3) in order to have it on RDS (4) and never hear from you again? This is a colorful exaggeration. But it’s true. It is playing out with the pgvecto-rs people too. People don’t want Postgres because it is good. They want it because it is offered by RDS, which makes it good. |
|
> develop all the functionality of RabbitMQ as a Postgres extension with the most permissive license
That's fair - we're not going to develop all the functionality of RabbitMQ on Postgres (if we were, we probably would have started with a amqp-compatible broker). We're building the orchestration layer that sits on top of the underlying message queue and database to manage the lifecycle of a remotely-invoked function.