|
|
|
|
|
by jampekka
727 days ago
|
|
"Natural" rights are clearly a social construction, and indeed largely the same thing that was theologically justified with God. They were literally just invented few hundred years ago. And have even changed since then (owning another human being was somehow a natural/god given right). Humans have organized (and keep on organizing) without any such conception for at least tens of thousands of years, but suddenly its natural? Who is the absolute arbiter of "evil"? USA of course holds itself as a force for good, and e.g. islamism as evil. Islamists do the opposite. Very rarely anybody thinks themselves as evil, but readily point out evil in others. This is in no way to support islamism, or USA. Just that morality is just mostly an arbtrary justification for whatever somebody wants to or doesn't want to get done. We can discuss the merits and shortcomings of e.g. ownership based on its societal consequences just fine without conjuring metaphysics. |
|