|
|
|
|
|
by Zafira
719 days ago
|
|
I think this touches on an interesting question. What obligation do free or open source project maintainers have? Even if a maintainer slaps on a, “I do what I want with this project. I am not responsible for any damages. There is no support” disclaimer, I am not sure that necessarily removes some social responsibilities. |
|
In this case the service is "push", which is very different. Any website that used polyfill.io can have any changes pushed to it, regardless of if the author even had known about a change being made.
If my popular project is replaced with a single poop emoji on NPM any existing user is fine (especially since NPM keeps old versions after the whole left-pad thing) and will find an alternative. If polyfill.io replaces their code with
that's not fine, since it affects existing users without any update step.I think that nobody should use these public CDNs at all, including things like unpkg and cdnjs, or at the very least using subresource integrity. Either way this has been something that has been on the horizon for years and similar to the buying of popular webextensions.