Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by patmcc 716 days ago
I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers - just that this particular ruling is not related (directly/legally) to the actions of the Supreme Court justices themselves.
1 comments
Hasu 716 days ago
> I don't think anyone is arguing in favour of bribes for either local or federal officers

Not here, but six Supreme Court Justices have done exactly that.

link