The original "injunction" was put in place by a Trump appointed "judge" as the result of legal action from Republican Attorney Generals in Louisiana and Missouri --- all without any evidence to support the allegation of "coercion".
The right-wing SCOTUS seems to have determined it was a bit too much.
To their credit, yes they did.
The total lack of evidence did not support any such broad injunction. This case should never have made it to the SC docket. The fact it did just reeks of influence peddling and partisan gamesmanship.
The original "injunction" was put in place by a Trump appointed "judge" as the result of legal action from Republican Attorney Generals in Louisiana and Missouri --- all without any evidence to support the allegation of "coercion".