What's the difference between your offering and the plethora of others? [1] Do you offer all checkpoints and LoRas even those who are not free to use in generation services or the IP-adapters with insightface as requirements? Rather fishy tbh.
Also offering workflows from your team that infringe on copyrights from the mouse is a bold move.
We don't offer any non-free-to-use checkpoints/LORAs on the platform out-of-the-box. If you wanted to import a model/lora to your own account from a CivitAI link you can do so, but we're at this point letting users do this under good faith that they have permission to use these models.
We also have face IP-adapter nodes in our app!
I would say there are a lot of more minor UX differences about our app than other offerings. One particular favorite of mine is the ability to switch between the Node Editor screen and the Playground screen using cmd+p.
We built this feature mainly bc the node editor isn't great for generating images, but it's awesome for dialing in the exact aesthetic you want with different nodes/settings. We built the Playground screen for generating images once you have a workflow you like.
We also have face IP-adapter nodes in our app!
I would say there are a lot of more minor UX differences about our app than other offerings. One particular favorite of mine is the ability to switch between the Node Editor screen and the Playground screen using cmd+p.
We built this feature mainly bc the node editor isn't great for generating images, but it's awesome for dialing in the exact aesthetic you want with different nodes/settings. We built the Playground screen for generating images once you have a workflow you like.