|
|
|
|
|
by altruios
725 days ago
|
|
Reading through the article - the source data is 1,500 people. Not insignificant, but reading between the lines at some the criticism outlined - it may be the case that those 1,500 people were chosen selectively in a way that could bias the conclusions (maybe unintentionally). I would love to get data on where my brain is at! I myself have no gender (like how some people just don't have a religion). I have a sex, and an orientation... just no gender. But yeah, more data is needed to take this study seriously (reproducibility for one). |
|