|
|
|
|
|
by avianlyric
724 days ago
|
|
Landlords provide infrastructure (wall, roofs, electrical systems, plumbing, fire systems) needed for shops to function, or continue to function at all. Shops could just build their own market stands to avoid their landlords owning the relationship with their customers. Huh, that argument doesn’t seem as reasonable when applied to landlords and buildings. And yes, many app developers don’t pay much or anything to Apple, and shops always pay rent. But here’s the thing, as an Apple customer I pay Apple when I buy my phone. Why should Apple be allowed to double dip? It never seems reasonable when ISP want to charge their customers and content providers for bandwidth, so why is it reasonable for Apple to do something similar with Apps? |
|