|
|
|
|
|
by masklinn
719 days ago
|
|
> A good rule of thumb is hash maps are preferable unless you need predictable worst case performance or your hash maps are directly exposed to the public. Also, obviously, features only one of them provides e.g. if you need range queries then a hash table is quite useless. Meanwhile if you need insertion ordering, that’s reasonably easy to do with a hashmap. |
|
Yes, you can throw the nodes on an array in the heap to allow tail recursion, but at that point you're going to be losing to a map with all but the biggest datasets, and even then the copies really aren't desirable