Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by petermcneeley 729 days ago
Another way of looking at it is what if this was just a legit unintentional scientific error. The scientific process is not suppose to be so fragile that a paper by an individual causes it to go astray for 16 years.
1 comments

Yes, we can generate an infinite number of interpretative frames. But what principle do we have to sort good from bad?