It’s not a direct relationship as far as I know. The point is that maybe the LLMs gave enablement for the people that thinks about software as a “means to an end” and I think it’s completely fine.
I like elegant code, well written and easy to maintain; but for a long time the field of programming started to develop the pristine idea that the programming _was the end_ and not as a way to achieve something.
What’s the post author made was to bring it in a more latent way saying that you could use programming to achieve the same results but you do not need.
I like elegant code, well written and easy to maintain; but for a long time the field of programming started to develop the pristine idea that the programming _was the end_ and not as a way to achieve something.
What’s the post author made was to bring it in a more latent way saying that you could use programming to achieve the same results but you do not need.