|
|
|
|
|
by realreality
720 days ago
|
|
In order to replace the world's current energy mix with nuclear, we'd have to switch on a new nuclear plant every day for the next several decades. All of that new infrastructure would also require massive amounts of fossil fuels to build (which you've magically made illegal) and would only last a few decades before having to be replaced (presumably without requiring any fossil fuels by then). There isn't even enough copper on earth to electrify everything. Your scenario isn't a miracle; it's a pipe-dream. |
|
Burning coal has an energy density around 24 MJ/kg for lignite (a lower grade of coal) to about 32 MJ/kg for anthracite (the highest grade of coal).
This makes utilizing U235 for energy around 2,500,000 more efficient than coal.
If we used thorium-232 instead, the theoretical energy density is around 79,000,000 megajoules per kilogram (MJ/kg) if considering the full lifecycle of the reaction.
The physics speaks for itself, regardless of people too dense to understand numbers.
Just because fossil fuels own our governments, industry, and most societal mechanisms, doesn't make the world they've fabricated real.