|
|
|
|
|
by viraptor
721 days ago
|
|
It is, but also it's a helpful simplification, I believe. It's kind of like a cup and a ring being topologically equivalent. Helps you talk about some generic thing without overloading with details. Then there are many more layers on top: palms facing up/down/side, cupped or pressed against, which part of the hand/arm/body are you holding, which one's on top, compression or stretch, at what height, etc. |
|
There's more topology as well when you start bringing in other characteristics of a position, like relative distance and orientation of the dances, you can find more equivalence classes for the other types of equivalences that fall out of that.