[jbandela1]

I think part of the reason is that people understand that while in games such as chess, etc the entire state of the “universe” of the problem is provided to the algorithm, in the real world, they don’t have that confidence.

There are all sorts of cofounders to algorithms in the real world and an expert human is better at dealing with unexpected cofounders than an algorithm. Given the number of confounded possible, in real world use, it is likely that there will be at least 1 confounder.