| > Well I'm pretty sure they have some evidence to support that claim [...] > article: To this day, it is unknown how the Incas worked with these calculators. There are several hypotheses about their use [...] It appears, that there are people who have formed hypotheses, but apparently no consensus... --- > article: The mysterious tablets were apparently suitable for all four basic arithmetic operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Many objects are suitable for numeric calculation (technically any object), just looking around my room I see a cupcake pan and a chess board -- the chess board being a little more useful for doing 8-bit binary arithmetic, but if I combine it with the cupcake pan I can add a dedicated shift register which makes mult/div a bit easier :) ---
Your continued quote from above: > [...] especially considering they can directly link the word to the meaning "count". Yes, because as we all know - words in any given language only have a single meaning! 8P > Do you always just assume science is wrong? Last time I checked; jumping to a conclusion using a minimum of evidence isn't scientific. |
It's somewhat ironic that you throw around a speculation that everything is speculated without actually trying to look at the possible evidence yourself.