[rhelz]

> I ask you to consider what is more likely: that your blanket definition of asynchronous is incorrect as applied here or the author is just [elided] with us by adding random words

LMAO!!! Well, when you put it that way, I can't blame you for not believing me. Your skeptical mindset will no doubt serve you well in this era of deep fakes and AI hallucinations.

Alas, it is also an example of how this skepticism, however necessary, is going to slow down the sharing of information :-( Its the price we're going to pay for so much lying and such a breech of the social contract.

I assure you, however, w2c.c is not asynchronous. It would be nice if the author could step in here and clarify, because it is hella confusing.

I don't believe the author is Effing with us either--documentation and comments are not automatically synced with the code they describe, so its easy for them to drift apart. Perhaps the author is intending to implement asynchronous features in the future, or perhaps he changed his goals between when he wrote the README and when he wrote the code.