Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by daft_pink 723 days ago
I don’t want to bother with vendor lock in and an additional single point of failure. That’s why I don’t use sso
1 comments

SAML and OAUTH2 are open standards, and single-point of failure generally means a single server or host- but I take the point that having a centralised service becoming unavailable would affect new logins.

However, you're rather naive if you think this is what would keep you locked in, changing authentication host (usually tied to mail, calendars, chat) is... difficult, and changing the SSO stuff is one of the easiest parts of the migration speaking from experience.

SSO is quite useful when you have onboarding and offboarding, remembering every place a person had an account with access to critical company data is horrible and trying to convince people to not share passwords between them is horrible too- a breach in one, in those cases, is a breach in all.