[dualogy]

> I am so excited for a Lispy systems language.

Can recommend Gerbil Scheme. Although fair warning, still GC'd and (for now) only type-annotated, not (100%) statically typed. But stdlib-wise and compilation-wise still way more "systems-bent" than most Schemes out there.

[dang]

Related:

Gerbil Scheme – A Lisp for the 21st Century - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39809323 - March 2024 (126 comments)

Gerbil – A meta-dialect of Scheme - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20585637 - Aug 2019 (17 comments)

Gerbil Scheme - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17707622 - Aug 2018 (9 comments)

Gerbil – An opinionated dialect of Scheme designed for systems programming - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15394603 - Oct 2017 (78 comments)

[nerdponx]

Gerbil is based on Gambit, right? Have you tried Gambit itself? I'm curious how they compare.

[dualogy]

Haven't, so no hard "comparison" results to offer — but Gambits libs are included in Gerbil and readily importable or some of them (maybe all? dunno) auto-imported, and Gambit is Gerbil's compilation foundation essentially AFAIK. Where it differs from or expands upon the Gambit basis is "our own macro expander" (haven't particular gotten into that area of understanding yet tho) and the extremely-modern-real-worldish stdlib (http, json, actors, db driver bindings etc), perhaps other aspects too (ie. might cover further SRFIs beyond what Gambit does, dunno for sure though; ie. the FFI might be beyond Gambit's or not, again I wouldn't know).