[umanwizard]

> As you say, the use of the word "addiction" in this context has nothing to do with scientific or medical reality.

I didn’t say anything like that. I said they’re perhaps using the word in a way that is broader than it’s used in medical jargon. That’s not the same thing as saying the word is meaningless or has nothing to do with reality.

[superkuh]

> this law is not a “medical setting”.

And from other posts it's clear that you and those behind this legislation care nothing for science of medical standards when drafting law.