Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
thecodedmessage
722 days ago
The way they’re using hard-fork and soft-fork, is that based on the blockchain usage of the words? If so, that makes it hard for me to take seriously!
3 comments
tripleo1
720 days ago
??:
https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/#why-was-forgejo-create...
link
zaphod420
722 days ago
I think a better term would have been "non-breaking backwards compatible change". hard/soft forks are very much the jargon used when talking about ways to upgrade blockchain based protocols.
link
celdon25
721 days ago
It’s a bit disingenuous to mention that without acknowledging that it was an open source terminology first.
https://producingoss.com/en/forks.html#:~:text=A%20hard%20fo...
.
link
celdon25
721 days ago
I’m no blockchain fan, but… wow. So much to unpack there. I’m not sure taking it seriously was ever on the table.
link