And deny you the pleasure of proactively and sufficiently supporting your argument? Nah -- proof is on the claimant.
I proved my claim sufficiently: zinc is not currently recommended as a treatment or preventative for COVID-19, per my linked source (which is current and, unless you are actively in the research domain, reasonably authoritative). I will admit that I did not communicate that they did have a carve out in the recommendations for clinical studies regarding zinc, but I did not feel that was material to the discussion..
But we can see that the NIH is going against what’s been shown in meta studies.
Let me tell you a story. My friend was in the World Trade Center when the other tower was hit by a plane. There were being held back by authority figures like security guards telling them not to leave the building because it’s safest. He said forget about that and got a bunch of people to break through the security guards. By the time they reach the 10th floor, the second plane hit their building and they were buffed around the stairwell like ragdolls. if you listen to authority, he would be dead.
Submitting to authority is the problem. Questioning authority is science. Its fine to go along with whatever the NIH believes, but that doesn’t make it true nor helpful.
I proved my claim sufficiently: zinc is not currently recommended as a treatment or preventative for COVID-19, per my linked source (which is current and, unless you are actively in the research domain, reasonably authoritative). I will admit that I did not communicate that they did have a carve out in the recommendations for clinical studies regarding zinc, but I did not feel that was material to the discussion..