Indian naming traditions vary by region. It gets intricate upon emigration and matching to Western formats. e.g. this distinguished biophysicist also goes by one name:
Indeed. I had a professor in undergrad named Kanapathipillai Thirugnanasambanthan. He might've been from Sri Lanka rather than India proper, though.
He went by "Sam Thiru".
When I first began I asked a friend if he knew anything about this "Professor Thiru". He said "Well, that's not really his name. His real name wouldn't fit in the schedule." :-)
Later, a different professor used him as an example of why it was a bad idea to hard-code the length of name fields.
Great guy, and one of the best instructors I've ever had.
Lots of people from Andhra/Telugu people have many names, and are known by initials or drop them if they come to the US. That sometimes includes optional caste names or titular names that come at the end, with the family name leading (as in China and Japan). My uncle, for example, had a four-word given name, formally introduced his given name in India or in temples as the latter two, and then dropped the first of the two, and swapped family-first for first-family when he came to the states.
For example, if you ever fly into Bangalore or Mumbai, you'll see GVK on their airports. That's for Gunapati Venkata Krishna Reddy, who goes by GVK. Gunapati is the family name, Venkata Krishna is his given name, and Reddy is the caste name.
Other examples are NT Rama Rao, P.V. Narasimha Rao, and my favorite, is a person I know of who went by KRKVNS Sharma.
I had an Indian colleague that only had one name. To fit in with the company she went by a double first name. i.e (I can't remember her Indian name) Jane Jane.
There's a noted chemist named Warren Warren. Washington State had a football player named Samoa Samoa. Hawaii had a great volleyball player named Allen Allen.
I really don't understand why people give names like this. I understand how they happen when you're trying to force a name into a naming convention that isn't the one it comes from, but why start your kid out that way?
I think the naming convention of naming your kid William (as an example) just so they can be called Bill the rest of their life is even more peculiar. Why walk that extra mile?
I think it’s mostly so they can have some degree of choice over what they are called.
You might call them Bill, but they can decide to call themselves Billy, or Will, or Willy, or William - without the hassle of actually changing their name.
There is also a class thing where naming a kid with a short form is seen as being lower class.
Class is absolutely part of it in my experience. The difference between Chuck and Charles, between Chad and Chadwick, Bob and Robert, and so on. The old money folks I’ve known were very particular about that sort of thing, while few others seemed to care too much.
In publications from colleges/universities, that usually means "graduate class of year". When no institution is specified, it usually means "this institution".
So in this case, it means Divakar (graduate of MIT class of 2001) and Prabhakar (graduate of MIT class of 2004).
To add to your clear response, listing a year without giving any other detail also indicates a Bachelors degree.
If instead they had earned a graduate degree, that would be indicated with some abbreviation for the granting school/college. (I don't know the MIT terms, but at Yale it could be SOM '01, MED '04, LAW '05, etc.)
He went by "Sam Thiru".
When I first began I asked a friend if he knew anything about this "Professor Thiru". He said "Well, that's not really his name. His real name wouldn't fit in the schedule." :-)
Later, a different professor used him as an example of why it was a bad idea to hard-code the length of name fields.
Great guy, and one of the best instructors I've ever had.