[overthemoon]

Do we have an idea of how hard they're working to ID people? Did the people accused of pirating media do anything to hide themselves? Would a VPN have been enough to make it too difficult or annoying to track them down?

Edit, from TFA: "“This decrease results from a plurality of factors, such as the positive impact of the graduated response procedure, the transformation of practices regarding the consumption of cultural works on the internet, the acceleration of the dissemination of legal offers during the year, or even increasing use of workaround solutions (VPNs) by Internet users,” the regulator explains."

[ExoticPearTree]

I have this feeling that they go after seeders that go above a certain threshold.

Looking into 2.6M individuals, determining that the offense is real, figure out the possible loss to the copyright holder, identifying the user, send all this paperwork to all the public prosecutors around the country and have them prosecute people for $100-$200 loss to some company doesn't seem feasible.

[luto]

In Germany they also go after small fish. The process is highly automated, so there is very little cost to the copyright holder.

[londons_explore]

I would guess that if you can get payouts from some small chunk of users, you can then use those funds to 'reinvest' in tracking down and catching more.

As soon as the process is sufficiently automated to be margin positive, you might as well scale it up to the whole population.

[ExoticPearTree]

I think it has to do with the fact the ISPs are responding to requests automatically and don't fight for user privacy.

[ssijak]

what IP you get when you have starlink?