|
|
|
|
|
|
by MeImCounting
732 days ago
|
|
|
So yeah I dont disagree with you that attempting to exert control over oneself is a desirable thing or that it generally results in things that wouldnt have happened if one didnt work to have control over ones cognition, behavior etc. This isn't at all at odds with my deterministic view in my opinion. I guess what I am asking is what is causing you to exert control over cognition?
I would say its the sum of too many variables to count (including previous states of the system) acting on you to cause you, the system to be in such a state that that is just what it does. Given enough time and resources we could probably come up with a half decent accounting of the most important of those variables and be able to explain why the system is doing a given thing. In this example that means explaining why the system is modifying its own state in some way.
What would you say is the cause? > Have you an opinion on whether your opinion is necessarily true? Yes my opinion is that my opinion is likely true as I believe it is supported by evidence. I would bet on it but I am not certain about it. |
|
|
Can you explain how it is not? As I see it, my theory is directly breaking out of determinism.
> I guess what I am asking is what is causing you to exert control over cognition?
Consciousness (self-awareness, will & determination, etc...the "how" of which I make no claims of knowledge about). I absolutely agree that it is substantially out of our control and thus at least semi-deterministic, where we would differ (at least) is on the 100% part.
There are many problems, here are some:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decidability_(logic)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_and_indirect_realism
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotard%27s_syndrome