|
|
|
|
|
by Retric
726 days ago
|
|
The original word is really just descriptive of the unpleasant side of optimization you see in commerce. Walmart finding the minimum product quality they can sell is no different than Facebook finding the maximum number of Advertisements people will tolerate. |
|
> "I call this enshittification, and it is a seemingly inevitable consequence arising from the combination of the ease of changing how a platform allocates value, combined with the nature of a "two sided market," where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, holding each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them." (emphasis mine)
All I'm saying is that citing back to the original definition (which is talking about platforms) does not bolster the case that what Adobe is doing counts, because it plainly doesn't fall under that definition. Adobe is not running a two-sided market. For it to be enshittification you need to use a much more expansive definition. Which is fine, but in that case you can't cite the original definition!