|
|
|
|
|
by JoshMock
5123 days ago
|
|
I'll be 100% behind this project when it has as much control over a device as Tasker does. Recipes in JavaScript and not having to "program" on the device itself are exactly the kinds of things I wish Tasker could do. The modeOfTransport monitor is pretty attractive too. Beyond all that, I'm curious about on{X}'s battery usage. That's a huge selling point for always-on processes like this. |
|