[II2II]

> In terms of total data, probably not.

> In terms of important data, 100% not.

Choosing not to focus upon quantity or quality is likely the reason why SQLite is so popular. It is a lot easier to manage and develop for SQLite than it is to do the same for large databases that require high availability and reliability under heavy loads. There are many more applications for small databases that contain data that is important to the end user even though that data may not be important to anyone else.

[TZubiri]

You can also use a plain file system, it allows data to be exported more easily and through un unbiased app like a file explorer.

I'd say if the data is important and client side, you'd probably want it to be accesible in a protocol format rather than a sqlite file format.

It's cool that sqlite is open source and u can technically recover the data, but at the end of the day excel data is more accesible, which defeats the ethos of open sourceness