[vinnyvichy]

He'd better not be also studying cdS, because that hits too close to oikos.

(Acronym because I need any now or ever other lurkers on this thread to work just a wee harder)

[082349872349872]

As long as you're far from H15 (wk*kufbw?), then all is well.

Otherwise I fear the vexillary varieties may indeed be waving from his (not a Tits building) field pavilion.

[vinnyvichy]

Ah alright, I gather that particular dimension 2^{5-1}-1 should still be helpful at some point..

Here's a ... my response to that as a theoretical engineer https://youtu.be/v5ev-RAg7Xs

(1:10 Every property a feature! (See comments for less obvious takes with regards to your coalescence hierarchies))

Your geneticists? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...

EDIT: ahhh missed that it's already frontpaged

PEE: looks like the usual nonconfrontational juxtaposition of the tribes ("they use our words but not our theorems")

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40693845

[vinnyvichy]

Section 5.1 lemma of Gr.

As Physics for the staid hens, So Flags for the rabid fens https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/bruy%C3%A8re (Root of Bruhat?)

[082349872349872]

Sorry, not Hⁿ (or even Ext), but a particular problem from the bloke who claimed we must (deontic necessity) know and will (dynamic) know. Maybe it would've been clearer as H15/23?

(if we were chemists, H₁₅ would sound very unstable)

[vinnyvichy]

Gnoramus et gnorabimus? (Personal preference: H13.)

But if we were physicists H₁₅ would have a rich inner life https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/142

[082349872349872]

and if we were (Jungian?) psychologists, having a rich inner life and being very unstable would be perfectly compatible.

"Gnoramus et gnorabimus?" is absolutely gusting, btw...