|
|
|
|
|
by notaustinpowers
736 days ago
|
|
The content is only a part of it. We are a species specially-suited to pick up on others emotional states and factor that in our responses. A mismatch in response to certain emotions is going to cause further problems as, to an angry customer, it comes off as patronizing, dismissive, and disrespectful. Typically, angry customers are conveying severity and urgency. If you do not respond with a similar sense of severity or urgency you now have two people who aren't on the same page. That's not a good foundation to solve problems on. |
|
I personally take care in this, saying things to reassure, such as indicating that I know it's the company's fault, not the rep's. This vecomes more of a "bartender" situation, where the anger is clearly at the situation, not the rep, and can create a more engaged, helpful response even.
I think one could sue for purposefully changing a person's appearance or voice, without their consent. And no, calling a help line can never ever have a tos enforced, as often the entity is required by law to deal with warranty or other issues. No tos applies.
Back to changing the voice, as others have mentioned, tenor, tone, etc all are part of speaking. They cannot be separated.
Tone is often, for example, brought up in testimony as it conveys something. It has as much meaning as the words.
I would be astonished if this isn't challenged soon.