Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mytailorisrich 737 days ago
The drafting of the law is always important and the normal way to settle ambiguity and disputes on interpretation is to go to court.

Nothing conspirational there...

1 comments

+1 the OP hasn't offered anything resembling evidence for their position anyway. It's worth noting that 3 of the supreme court justices who voted to lift this ban were appointed by the president who ordered the ban. Is this an example of the famous "4D chess" we've been hearing about?